This new Kindle, Amazon’s third generation, is smaller by 21 percent, and 15 percent lighter too. It has much improved contrast, 50 percent better than before, answering a significant complaint among dead-tree purists who compared the device’s e-ink screen unfavorably to real paper. It’s available in two colors: graphite and white.

Read the full story on MSNBC

Related articles by Zemanta

• Amazon unveils sleek third-generation Kindle (macworld.com)
• Amazon launches a new Kindle, with modest improvements (blogs.consumerreports.org)

I’ve had my hands on the Nook, and I was disappointed in what almost all the reviewers seem to be disappointed in. But first some positives.

The Nook offers battery access, its only unique feature. Also, it’s pretty, and comfy in the hands—the back is curved with some nice ergonomics. Once I got to an e-book, the Nook’s quality matched my Sony 300 in terms of resolution for text, and the page turn lag was as expected. The Nook offers no bold, but three different fonts that are easy on the eyes, including Helvetica.

The Nook is slow, however, and the navigation is hard to figure out. Compared to the Nook, the iPhone’s navigation wins hands down.

Even more confusing is doing the swipe thing on the capacitive touch pad to navigate the screen. While I knew that the E Ink screen was not a touch screen, my intuition kept telling me that was where I needed to swipe to navigate the lists up there. At first I thought this was a holdover habit because I own a Sony 700, but then one of the B & N associates told me that he, too, wanted to swipe on the Nook screen. In addition, there are some registration issues with the touch screen. It’s not always responsive.

The Nook also re-formats whatever you’re reading every time you access the file, even if you’ve opened it before. My husband made a big show of twiddling his thumbs while two B & N employees and I waited for the Nook to format the latest Charlaine Harris novel.

Read the full review on TeleRead